Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40986549›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2025

Prognostic value of D-dimer in treatment and follow up for patients who underwent radiotherapy in advanced lung cancer.

Huriye Senay Kiziltan, Kimia Cepni

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Huriye Senay KiziltanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-9930-7197
Kimia CepniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLung carcinma, a serious disease commonly recognized at advanced stages and has less favorable outcomes to treatments. This research examines the association between D-dimer values and clinical variables in patients diagnosed with advanced lung cancer, with a focus on their prognostic significance and radiotherapy related outcomes.

methodsThis retrospective observational descriptive cohort study, including 142 patients with lung cancer. Aa comprehensive analysis, was conducted, including demographic variables,clinical staging, pathology, laboratuary tests, and D-dimer levels measured both before and after the administration of radiotherapy.

resultsThe findings indicated that high pre-RT D-dimer concentrations were significantly assoccciated with advanced stages of disease, worse response of radiotherapy, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and decreased survival outcomes. Radiotherapy response also affects to survival rates with D-dimer values. The findings from both univariate and multivariable survival analyses demonstrated that lower concentrations of D-dimer correlated with better response of radiotherapy, extended overall survival and progression free survival (p: < 0.001).

conclusionThese results illustrate the significant role of D-dimer as a valuable biomarker for assessing tumor burden and guiding radiotherapy and other treatment strategies in lung cancer, thereby necessitating further inquiry to evaluate its clinical implications.

Indexed as

Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation ProductsLung NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Productsfibrin fragment D

Identifiers

PMID40986549
PMCPMC12456766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.