ArticlePloS one2025
Communicative patterns in online health communities: A comparative study of Italian and Polish.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper explores how online health platforms influence communication between patients and healthcare professionals, focusing on anxiety-related interactions in Italy and Poland. The study examines pairs of questions and answers, selected from Q&A services, within MioDottore and ZnanyLekarz, two medical platforms operating in these countries, with the main aim of identifying cross-cultural similarities and differences in communication strategies. Anxiety was chosen as a case study because it is one of the most prevalent mental health conditions, as revealed by research and national statistics, and because it is a prominent topic of discussion within online medical communities. Italy and Poland were chosen for comparison because of their different linguistic and socio-cultural contexts. Data were collected through an automated process based on a web-scraping algorithm and analysed using a mixed methods approach combining quantitative and qualitative techniques. The results show some clear differences in communicative patterns: Italian patients tend to use more indirect and polite forms, while Polish patients use a more direct style. Among practitioners, gender-related differences were found in the Polish responses: Polish women tend to adopt a more emphatic style. By contrast, Italian responses seem to be more influenced by professional specialisation: while psychiatrists tend to adopt a more pragmatic style (focusing more on the informational and request-oriented aspects of users' posts), psychologists typically adopt a more empathic approach (paying more attention to the emotional dimension, often linked to the suffering experiences disclosed by users). These findings highlight how digital health communication reflects broader cultural and professional norms, although further research is needed to confirm these patterns across different conditions and clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.