Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40986514›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Dehydration does not drive host behavioural manipulation by hairworms.

Louise M Coates, Kieran Reynolds, Mara Carey-Wood, Dominika Lastik, Chris Vennard, Jean-François Doherty, Eddy Dowle, Benjamin J Matthews, Leonard J Foster, Stuart E Reynolds and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Louise M CoatesDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0009-3140-0721
Kieran ReynoldsDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0000-6543-4545
Mara Carey-WoodDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Dominika LastikDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Chris VennardDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Jean-François DohertyDepartment of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4766-9417
Eddy DowleDepartment of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Benjamin J MatthewsDepartment of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8697-699X
Leonard J FosterMichael Smith Laboratories, Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Stuart E ReynoldsDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Vicky L HuntDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7094-044X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nematomorphs are parasitic worms of arthropods, which complete their life cycle via behavioural manipulation of their host so that they can enter water to find a mate. Although this behaviour is readily observed, the underlying mechanism is largely unknown; previously proposed hypotheses include an attraction to polarised light, increased erratic behaviour and dehydration-driven behaviour. Here, we investigated the 'Dehydration Hypothesis', which posits that nematomorphs either induce dehydration or mimic dehydration through biosynthetic changes to stimulate host water-seeking behaviour. House crickets, Acheta domesticus, were experimentally deprived of water and their behaviour compared to crickets infected with the nematomorph Paragordius varius. Both infected and dehydrated crickets were more likely to interact with water than uninfected, hydrated crickets. However, dehydrated crickets preferred to submerge their heads in the water compared to infected crickets which preferred to fully enter the water. Quantitative mass spectrometry of cricket haemolymph identified unique proteomic signatures of infection (27 differentially abundant proteins, infected cf. control) and dehydration (17 differentially abundant proteins, dehydrated cf. control). Our results indicate that dehydration is not a strong driving mechanism for behavioural manipulation by nematomorphs, but nevertheless infected and dehydrated share the increased tendency of dehydrated crickets to interact with water. Our data also provide new insights into the proteomic response during nematomorph infection. Notably, we observed a decrease in the cricket egg yolk protein vitellogenin and the carbohydrate digestion enzyme α-amylase, and an increase in abundance of the immune related hemocyanin protein family.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalDehydrationGryllidaeHost-Parasite InteractionsAnimalsHemolymph

Identifiers

PMID40986514
PMCPMC12456768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.