ArticlePloS one2025
Clinical parameters associated with mortality in elderly patients with COVID-19.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundElderly patients with COVID-19 face a heightened risk of severe outcomes and mortality, emphasizing the need for reliable early risk stratification in emergency departments (EDs). Clinical parameters such as respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and peripheral perfusion index (PPI) have shown promise as simple and effective markers associated with mortality.
methodsThis retrospective, single-center study included 144 COVID-19-positive patients aged 65 years and older admitted to a university hospital in Mugla, Turkey, from February 15, 2021, to April 15, 2023. Vital signs, shock indices, and PPI were collected from medical records. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and binary logistic regression analysis were used to evaluate the associations of these parameters with in-hospital mortality.
resultsAmong 144 patients, 37 (26%) died during hospitalization. PPI ≤ 2.20 was the most sensitive parameter (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.684, sensitivity = 75.7%, negative predictive value [NPV] = 87.7%), allowing the early identification of patients at lower mortality risk. Oxygen saturation ≤ 86% demonstrated the highest specificity (79.4%) and positive predictive value [PPV] (46.3%), effectively identifying patients at high risk. Respiratory rate ≥ 25 breaths/min (AUC = 0.652) also showed significant association with mortality. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that low PPI levels were independently associated with increased in-hospital mortality (Odds ratio [OR] = 4.067; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.668-9.913; p = 0.002).
conclusionsThis study highlights the powerful association of readily available clinical parameters with mortality among elderly COVID-19 patients. PPI, in combination with respiratory rate and oxygen saturation, offers a cost-effective and efficient approach to enhance ED triage protocols. Incorporating these parameters into routine assessment could improve early identification of high-risk patients, optimize resource allocation, and save lives. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and advance risk stratification frameworks for acute care settings. Our findings should be considered as associations with mortality rather than strong predictive evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.