ArticleJournal of patient safety2025
The Value of a Cross-Disciplinary Approach to Human and System Performance Research in Obstetrics and Neonatology: AHRQ's Patient Safety Learning Laboratory.
Article in Journal of patient safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn creating an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Patient Safety Learning Laboratory (PSLL), our objective has been to establish a multidisciplinary research environment focused on the safe care of pregnant women and newborns. This manuscript describes work performed under grants P30 HS023506 (obstetric focus) and R18 HS029123 (neonatal focus).
methodsWe follow AHRQ's 5-step approach to systems engineering in health care: problem analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. Within this 5-step approach, methods used include interviews, focus groups, direct observation, teamwork scales, flow disruption analysis, the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model, design thinking, and simulation-based testing of processes and prototypes.
resultsGrant P30 HS023506 is completed. The physical characteristics of 10 labor and delivery units were examined, finding significant heterogeneity in size, design, and organization. Task analysis revealed multiple obstacles to optimal team performance. We designed and tested a delayed cord clamping cart to address inherent ergonomic challenges. Finally, we identified common lapses in verbal communication during obstetric emergencies. Grant R18 HS029123 is ongoing. Eighteen Need Statements serve as the basis for exploratory work in mitigating threats to neonates during resuscitation, including a task analysis to determine points of intervention. We are developing (a) novel resuscitation platforms, (b) improved methods of equipment/supply organization, (c) new means of acquiring, displaying, and processing multiple data streams, and (d) innovative techniques and devices for neonatal intubation.
conclusionsThe approach to systems engineering in health care supported by AHRQ's PSLL funding mechanism fosters critical thinking about safety issues by facilitating the integration of investigators with diverse, complementary expertise. By encouraging such collaboration, AHRQ's 5-step process enables important questions to be answered. The PSLL mechanism is a valuable resource for the patient safety community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.