Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40986480›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2025

Exploring the clinical utility of rhythmic digital markers for schizophrenia.

Axel Constant, Vincent Paquin, Robert A Ackerman, Colin A Depp, Raeanne C Moore, Philip D Harvey, Amy E Pinkham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Axel ConstantDepartment of Engineering and Informatics, The University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1547-8803
Vincent PaquinLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9589-039X
Robert A AckermanDepartment of Psychology, School of Behavior and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas, United States of America.
Colin A DeppDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Raeanne C MooreDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Philip D HarveyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Amy E PinkhamDepartment of Psychology, School of Behavior and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas, United States of America.

Funding

Introspective Accuracy, Bias, and Everyday Functioning in Severe Mental IllnessR01MH112620 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI PINKHAM, AMY · 2018 to 2021
$3.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112620
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the clinical utility of rhythmic digital markers (RDMs) in schizophrenia. RDMs are digital markers capturing behavioral rhythms over different timescales - within 24 hours span (ultradian), at a span of 24 hours (circadian), or over cycles of more than 24 hours (infradian). While previous research has explored digital markers for schizophrenia, the focus has primarily been on sensor data variability rather than rhythmic patterns. This study introduces two RDMs: an entropy RDM, which quantifies uncertainty in activity distribution over the infradian cycles, and a dynamic RDM, which is derived from models of transitions in entropy and psychotic symptom intensity using Markov chain analysis. Data were ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) of 39 activities collected from 390 individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia (N = 153) or bipolar disorder (N = 192) and controls (N = 45). We assessed associations between RDMs and symptom severity and whether participants could be differentiated based on these RDMs. We found that participants with schizophrenia significantly differed on dynamic RDMs, suggesting a potential diagnostic utility. However, dynamic RDMs were not associated with symptom severity, and entropy RDM had no significant clinical correlate. Our findings contribute to the growing evidence on digital markers in psychiatry and highlight the potential of rhythmic digital markers (RDMs) in characterizing digital phenotypes for schizophrenia.

Identifiers

PMID40986480
PMCPMC12456810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.