Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40986459›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

Understanding Health Care Workers' Attitudes and Preferences Toward Digital Patient Monitoring Platforms: Cross-Country Survey Study.

Costanza Tortù, Chiara Seghieri, Ditila Doracaj, Natalya Usheva, Natalia Giménez-Legarre, Yannis Manios

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05648383 (An Intersectoral Innovative Solution Involving DIGItal Tools, Empowering Families and Integrating Community CARE Services for the Prevention and Management of Type 2 Diabetes and Hypertension), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05648383 nacompletednot on this map

An Intersectoral Innovative Solution Involving DIGItal Tools, Empowering Families and Integrating Community CARE Services for the Prevention and Management of Type 2 Diabetes and Hypertension

TypeinterventionalSponsorHarokopio UniversityRan2022 to 2025Enrolled1,215ConditionsType 2 Diabetes, PreDiabetes, Hypertension, Obesity & OverweightArmsmHealth self-management intervention, Standard care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Costanza TortùInstitute of Management, L'EMbeDS, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Piazza Martiri della Libertà 33, Pisa, 56127, Italy, 39 050883863.ORCID 0000-0003-2561-9726
Chiara SeghieriInstitute of Management, L'EMbeDS, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Piazza Martiri della Libertà 33, Pisa, 56127, Italy, 39 050883863.ORCID 0000-0002-3910-7775
Ditila DoracajDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Medicine of Tirana, Tirana, Albania.ORCID 0000-0001-6198-8890
Natalya UshevaDepartment of Social Medicine and Health Care Organization, Medical University of Varna, Varna, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0003-4228-3152
Natalia Giménez-LegarreGENUD (Growth, Exercise, Nutrition and Development) Research Group, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2956-4219
Yannis ManiosDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Health Science and Education, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-6486-114X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The integration of digital health tools into the routines of health care workers (HCWs) holds potential to enhance health care delivery. In particular, digital tools for patient data monitoring allow HCWs to quickly access patient health information and detect early warning signs of potential issues. However, while interest in these tools, such as telemedicine and mobile health, has rapidly grown in recent years, limited research has explored HCWs' attitudes toward digital innovations or their feature preferences. Objective: This study aims to (1) assess HCWs' attitudes toward digital health tools for patient data monitoring, (2) identify socioeconomic factors influencing these attitudes, (3) determine HCWs' preferences for features of a novel digital health platform for patient data monitoring, and (4) examine whether HCWs' baseline attitudes impact their feature preferences. Methods: This study uses an integrated approach combining item response theory (IRT) and discrete choice experiment to evaluate the attitudes and preferences of HCWs. Data come from a web conjoint survey distributed to an international cohort of HCWs across the following 4 European countries: Spain, Albania, Bulgaria, and Greece. Results: Survey respondents comprise 260 HCWs from the 4 countries. The findings indicate that HCWs generally hold a positive attitude toward technological devices (all the IRT coefficients are statistically significant with P<.05). Socioeconomic characteristics, including factors such as gender (P=0.05), professional role (P=0.01), and educational background (P=0.01), significantly influence these attitudes. Results show that highly educated female HCWs are those who are mostly inclined to use technologies. In addition, the specific features of a digital health platform for patient data monitoring highly impact HCWs' willingness to incorporate such a tool into their daily practice (all coefficients related to the attributes' effects in the models for the discrete choice experiment results are significant (all P=0.01 except the data looking attribute which has P=0.03) . The findings suggest that an ideal digital health platform for patient data monitoring should offer intuitive graphs, comparative statistics against standards, and include patients' family clinical history. In addition, health workers should receive instructor-led group training to effectively use the platform. Conclusions: This study shows that health workers generally support the use of digital health tools, which have the potential to improve health care efficiency and patient outcomes through enhanced monitoring and timely interventions. To facilitate adoption, policymakers should strengthen infrastructure, enact supportive legislation, and tailor interventions for groups less inclined to use these tools. Aligning digital health platform features with HCW preferences is crucial, as it directly impacts HCWs' willingness to integrate these tools into daily routines, ultimately benefiting patients. Future research should examine additional factors influencing HCW adoption and address organizational and infrastructural barriers to optimize implementation of digital health platform and improve patient care.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelTelemedicineAdultEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesdiscrete choice experimentshealth care workershealth technologypreferencessurvey study

Identifiers

PMID40986459
PMCPMC12456460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.