ArticleJournal of analytical toxicology2026
Exploring the "poppy seed defense" in oral fluid: detection of opioids following poppy seed consumption.
Article in Journal of analytical toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The "poppy seed defense"-a claim that a positive opioid test result is due to ingestion of poppy seeds-is occasionally encountered in forensic toxicology. The matter has been thoroughly investigated in urine but is less researched in oral fluid. We therefore aimed to perform an experimental study to explore whether consumption of commercially available poppy seeds would lead to detection of opioids in oral fluid. Additionally, we aimed to relate our findings to routine cases. Ten volunteers consumed either five crispbreads containing a small amount of poppy seeds, or 30 g of raw poppy seeds with a low opioid content (3.0 mg/kg morphine and 0.9 mg/kg codeine). Oral fluid samples were collected 0.5 and 2 hours after consumption. Additionally, a urine sample was collected 2 hours after consumption. Following ingestion of raw seeds, morphine was detected (estimated neat oral fluid concentrations 1.4-5.6 ng/mL) in all oral fluid samples 0.5 hours after consumption and in one (2.4 ng/mL) of five oral fluid samples after 2 hours. Codeine was detected (0.8-1.1 ng/mL) in three of five oral fluid samples 0.5 hours after consumption, but in none after 2 hours. Following ingestion of crispbreads, morphine or codeine was not detected in oral fluid, but opioids/-glucuronides were detected in three of five urine samples. When comparing our results with routine cases, we found that 14% of routine cases had morphine concentrations in oral fluid samples lower or similar to those seen after ingestion of raw seeds in our experimental study. In conclusion, we found that consumption of raw seeds led to detection of opioids in oral fluid, but the detection window appeared to be short. Comparison with routine cases indicated that the poppy seed defense may be a challenge when interpreting oral fluid results, particularly when low cut-off levels are applied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.