ArticlePharmacoEconomics2025
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Aztreonam-Avibactam (ATM-AVI) Versus Colistin + Meropenem (COL + MER) for the Treatment of Infections Caused by Metallo-β-Lactamase (MBL)-Producing Enterobacterales in Italy.
Article in PharmacoEconomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breaking the deadlock of metallo-β-lactamases: evidence and prospects for Aztreonam/Avibactam.Emerging microbes & infections · 2026Review
- Budget impact analysis of aztreonam-avibactam for metallo-β-lactamase carbapenem-resistant enterobacterales infections in China.Infection · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes and therapeutic approaches in pediatric infections caused by metallo-β-lactamase-producing organisms: a five-year experience in a tertiary care hospital.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Article
- Treatment Options for Metallo-Beta-Lactamase-ProducingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveAztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI) is a novel combination antibiotic approved in Europe for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infection, hospital-acquired pneumonia, including ventilator-associated pneumonia; complicated urinary tract infection, including pyelonephritis and for infections due to aerobic Gram-negative organisms with limited treatment options. This analysis assessed the cost effectiveness of ATM-AVI ± metronidazole versus colistin + meropenem (COL + MER) for the treatment of patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection and hospital-acquired pneumonia/ventilator-associated pneumonia, including infections with suspected metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales from the public payer perspective in Italy using phase III trial data.
methodsThe cost-effectiveness analysis adopted a decision tree model to simulate the clinical pathway of complicated intra-abdominal infection and hospital-acquired pneumonia/ventilator-associated pneumonia, followed by a Markov model to capture lifetime health outcomes on cured patients, with costs valued in 2024 Euros and discounted at 3%. The model captures the impact of resistant pathogens and side effects (i.e. nephrotoxicity). Model uncertainty was assessed using a probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analysis.
resultsThe ATM-AVI treatment sequence (ATM-AVI ± metronidazole followed by cefiderocol after treatment failure) had improved clinical outcomes and higher cure rates, shorter hospital stays and higher quality-adjusted life-year gains compared with the COL + MER sequence (COL + MER followed by cefiderocol after treatment failure). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in the ATM-AVI sequence was dominant for complicated intra-abdominal infection and was €1552 per quality-adjusted life-year for hospital-acquired pneumonia/ventilator-associated pneumonia, well below the willingness-to-pay threshold of €30,000 in Italy.
conclusionsOur analysis suggests that ATM-AVI is expected to be a cost-effective use of Italian healthcare resources for treating suspected metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales, including complicated intra-abdominal infection and hospital-acquired pneumonia/ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.