Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40986250›Full record

Observational studyThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2025

Incidence and predictors of acute pulmonary embolism in patients with cancer referred for computed tomography pulmonary angiography.

Amit Janu, Suyash Kulkarni, Amit Joshi, Sharadhini K, Nitin Shetty, Kumar Prabhash, Shilpushp Bhosale

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amit JanuDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4557-3553
Suyash KulkarniDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5972-6111
Amit JoshiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Sharadhini KDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India. kkaranth225@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9013-5771
Nitin ShettyDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Kumar PrabhashDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Shilpushp BhosaleDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care & Pain, Tata memorial centre, Mumbai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients, yet its clinical presentation is often nonspecific, leading to potential overuse of CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA). This study aimed to determine the incidence of acute PE in a cohort of cancer patients referred for CTPA at a tertiary care cancer centre and to identify clinical and radiological risk factors that predict its presence. We conducted a retrospective observational study of 369 consecutive cancer patients who underwent CTPA for suspected PE between January 2015 and May 2019. Clinical, laboratory, and imaging data were collected from electronic medical records. CTPA scans were reviewed for the presence of acute PE and alternative diagnoses. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of PE. The negative predictive value of D-dimer was also assessed. The incidence of acute PE was 21.4% (79/369 patients; 95% CI: 17.2-25.6%). In patients without PE, disease progression (39%) and pulmonary infection (20%) were the most common alternative diagnoses. Significant independent predictors for PE included the presence of unilateral limb edema (OR = 5.236, p = .005), adenocarcinoma histology (OR = 1.986, p = .034), inpatient status (OR = 2.775, p = .037), and echocardiographic findings suggestive of right ventricular strain (OR = 4.157, p = .001). The negative predictive value of a D-dimer level > 500 ng/dl was 90.5%. Nearly one in five cancer patients with clinically suspected PE had a positive CTPA. Unilateral limb edema, inpatient status, adenocarcinoma histology, and signs of right heart strain on ECHO are significant predictors. These factors can aid in risk stratification, potentially refining the diagnostic pathway for PE in this high-risk population.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyNeoplasmsPulmonary EmbolismReferral and ConsultationAcute DiseaseAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation ProductsHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Productsfibrin fragment DCancer-Associated thrombosisComputed tomography pulmonary angiographyD-dimerIncidencePulmonary embolismRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID40986250
PMCPMC12628426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.