ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2025
Soluble recombinant enterovirus 71 VP1 fused to truncated newcastle disease virus nucleoprotein elicits immune responses in mice.
Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEnterovirus 71 (EV71) is a major causative agent of hand, foot, and mouth disease with potential neurological complications, highlighting the urgent need for effective vaccines. The viral protein 1 (VP1) contains major antigenic and neutralizing epitopes, making it a promising target for subunit vaccine development.
aimsThis study evaluated the immunogenicity of a recombinant VP1 fragment (amino acids 198-297) fused to a truncated Newcastle Disease Virus nucleoprotein (NPt-VP1t). MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY: Soluble NPt-VP1t (SP) and insoluble NPt-VP1t (IB) versions of the protein were expressed in E. coli, purified, and verified by SDS-PAGE and Western blot using anti-VP1 and anti-NDV antibodies, confirming the ~59 kDa fusion protein. Adult female BALB/c mice were immunized intraperitoneally with SP, IB, or PBS control, with two booster doses at two-week intervals.
resultsResults demonstrated that mice immunized with the SP formulation produced significantly higher anti-VP1 IgG reactivity than those receiving the IB or controls (p < 0.05). After the first booster (week 4), the antibody level in the SP was approximately 2-fold higher than the IB, with the highest OD readings observed at week 8 post-immunization. The SP maintained high antibody levels for at least two weeks post-booster. Splenocyte proliferation assays revealed that the SB group had a stimulation index (S.I.) of 0.826 ± 0.104, about 1.6 times greater than the IB group (p < 0.05). Cytokine profiling showed significantly elevated Th1 (IFN-γ, IL-2) and Th2 (IL-4, IL-6, IL-10) cytokines in both SP and IB groups compared to controls (p < 0.05), with IFN-γ levels markedly higher in vaccinated mice, indicating activation of both humoral and cell-mediated immunity. SDS-PAGE of the IB protein revealed contaminant bands, suggesting the actual amount of NPt-VP1t administered was lower than in the soluble formulation, potentially affecting its immunogenicity. All groups received formulations with Freund’s adjuvant, which may limit assessment of vaccine-specific safety.
conclusionOverall, the SP recombinant NPt-VP1t protein elicited robust humoral and cellular immune responses in mice, outperforming the insoluble form. These findings support the immunogenic potential of SP as a subunit vaccine candidate for EV71. Future studies should include viral challenge and neutralization assays to confirm protective efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.