Trial reportAdvances in therapy2025
Number Needed to Treat and Cost Per Responder Analysis of Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies for Migraine Prevention in Adults for Whom Prior Preventive Treatments have Failed.
Trial report in Advances in therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFour monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) signaling are approved for migraine prevention and commonly prescribed/reimbursed after the failure of repurposed anti-migraine medications. Participants achieving clinical response [e.g., ≥ 50% monthly migraine days (MMDs) reduction] during an anti-CGRP mAb trial are likely to continue treatment. We calculated number needed to treat (NNT) and quarterly cost per responder (CPR) across four anti-CGRP mAbs.
methodsData were from randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3b clinical trials that evaluated anti-CGRP mAbs (eptinezumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, erenumab) for migraine prevention in adults with episodic or chronic migraine for whom 2-4 prior preventive treatments have failed. NNT was calculated as 1 divided by absolute risk reduction (difference between active treatment and placebo in the proportion of participants with ≥ 50% or ≥ 75% MMD reduction over Weeks 1-12). CPR was calculated by multiplying NNT by the quarterly (3-month) drug acquisition CPR (£), based on the reimbursed list price in the United Kingdom (CPR could not be calculated for eptinezumab 300 mg). Statistical comparisons were not made.
resultsAll anti-CGRP mAbs demonstrated higher rates of ≥ 50% and ≥ 75% MMD reduction than their respective placebo (p < 0.05). The NNT to achieve ≥ 50% MMD reduction ranged from 2.7 (eptinezumab 300 mg) to 6.0 (erenumab 140 mg), and for ≥ 75%, 6.0 (eptinezumab 300 mg) to 16.2 (fremanezumab 675 mg/q). The cost per ≥ 50% responder ranged from £4647 (eptinezumab 100 mg) to £7009 (erenumab 140 mg), and for ≥ 75%, £9850 (eptinezumab 100 mg) to £21,862 (fremanezumab 675 mg/q).
conclusionsThese results show that, for most anti-CGRP mAbs, a low number of participants (< 10) with migraine need to be treated to achieve one person with a ≥ 50% or ≥ 75% reduction in MMDs over Weeks 1-12, with CPR ranging from £4647 (eptinezumab 100 mg) to £21,862 (fremanezumab 675 mg/q).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.