Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40986159›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2025

Oncologic outcomes and prognostic factors of colloid carcinoma of the pancreas - a retrospective real-world data analysis from the German cancer registry group of the society of German tumor centers.

Jannis Duhn, Lennart von Fritsch, Kim C Honselmann, Louisa Bolm, Christoph Gerling, Kees Kleihues-van Tol, Maria Elena Lacruz, Constanze Schneider, Fabian Reinwald, Andrea Sackmann and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Jannis DuhnDepartment of Surgery, University Medical-Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany. jannis.duhn@uksh.de.
Lennart von FritschDepartment of Surgery, University Medical-Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
Kim C HonselmannDepartment of Surgery, University Medical-Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
Louisa BolmDepartment of Surgery, University Medical-Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
Christoph GerlingDepartment of Surgery, University Medical-Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
Kees Kleihues-van TolNetwork for Care, Quality and Research in Oncology, German Cancer Registry Group of the Association of German Tumor Centers (ADT), Berlin, Germany.
Maria Elena LacruzCancer Registry Saxony-Anhalt, Halle, Germany.
Constanze SchneiderClinical-epidemiological Cancer Registry Berlin-Brandenburg, Berlin, Germany.
Fabian ReinwaldCancer Registry of Rhineland-Palatinate in the Institute for Digital Health Data, Mainz, Germany.
Andrea SackmannHessian Cancer Registry, Frankfurt on the Main, Germany.
Bianca FrankeNetwork for Care, Quality and Research in Oncology, German Cancer Registry Group of the Association of German Tumor Centers (ADT), Berlin, Germany.
Bernd HolleczekCancer Registry Saarland, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Anna KraußCancer Registry Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, c/o Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Steffen DeichmannDepartment of Surgery, University Medical-Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
Thaer S A AbdallaDepartment of Surgery, University Medical-Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
Monika Klinkhammer-SchalkeNetwork for Care, Quality and Research in Oncology, German Cancer Registry Group of the Association of German Tumor Centers (ADT), Berlin, Germany.
Sylke Ruth ZeissigInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry (ICE-B), University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Tobias KeckDepartment of Surgery, University Medical-Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany. tobias.keck@uksh.de.
Ulrich F WellnerDepartment of Surgery, University Medical-Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
Rüdiger BraunDepartment of Surgery, University Medical-Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColloid carcinoma (CC) is a rare subtype of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) characterized by mucin pools in over 80% of the tumor. This study compares the histopathology and outcomes of CC and not-otherwise specified PDAC (PDAC-NOS, referring to "classical" PDAC) using pooled data retrieved from regional cancer registries participating in the Clinical Cancer Registry Group of the Association of German Tumor Centers (GCRG/ADT). MATERIALS AND

methodsData from patients within the pooled dataset of the GCRG/ADT with pancreatic cancer (diagnosed between 2000 and 2023) were analyzed. Histological subtypes were identified by ICD-O3 histology code. Epidemiology, histopathology and survival rates were compared between surgically resected CC and PDAC-NOS. Prognostic impacts were assessed using uni- and multivariable regression analyses in R.

resultsThe study included 474 CC and 21,360 PDAC-NOS patients. CC patients presented more often without lymph node metastases (pN0: 44.0 vs. 31.5%, p < 0.001), lower grading and less lymphatic and blood vessel invasion (each p < 0.001). The R0 resection rate was similar in both groups. CC patients had superior OS compared to PDAC-NOS (median OS: 24.8 vs. 17.3 months, p < 0.001). Importantly, CC histology was an independent positive prognostic factor for OS. Grading, lymph- and blood-vessel invasion were independent prognostic factors for CC patients. Adjuvant therapy was associated with improved survival in UICC IIB CC patients.

conclusionCC patients showed better oncological outcomes after surgical resection compared to PDAC-NOS. Thereby, CC-subtype is an independent positive prognostic factor for OS, associated with lower tumor stages, fewer lymph node metastases, and less vascular invasion.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma, MucinousCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGermanyHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedPancreatectomyPrognosisRegistriesRetrospective StudiesCancer registryColloid carcinomaPancreatic cancerPancreatic surgeryPopulation based analysisReal-world data

Identifiers

PMID40986159
PMCPMC12457452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.