ArticleOdontology2026
Histopathological analysis of 30 specimens of glandular odontogenic cyst.
Article in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glandular odontogenic cysts (GOC) are relatively rare, and require differentiation from radicular cysts, dentigerous cysts, and central mucoepidermoid carcinoma of jawbone. We conducted clinical, histopathological, and immunohistochemical analysis to elucidate the relationship between the clinical behavior and histopathological features, as well as the origin of tissues and factors related to the development of GOC. Thirty specimens from 29 patients (19 males, 11 females; mean age 51.8, range 18-85 years) diagnosed histopathologically with GOC were studied. By location site, mandibular molar region was most common (17 cysts), followed by maxillary anterior region (5), maxillary molar region (4), and mandibular anterior region (4). All cases were clinically asymptomatic and were detected incidentally on X-ray examination. In the X-ray findings, all cases showed unilocular, well-defined radiolucencies, with a long diameter ranging from 9 to 36 mm. Histopathologically, eosinophilic cuboidal cells and microcysts were found in all cases, apocrine snouting was observed in 27 (90%), clear cells in 28 (93.3%), variable thickness of epithelial lining in 29 (96.7%), and mucous cells (both PAS and d-PAS positive) in 29 (96.7%). These six histopathological features were useful for histopathological diagnosis. There was one case of multiple metachronous bilateral mandibular lesions and one case of a locally aggressive type. Immunohistochemical staining showed CK19 positivity and BRAF positivity in all cases, and CK18 positivity in 24 (80%). Ki-67 was positive in the lining epithelium of a locally aggressive case, but positive cells were rare in other cases. CK19 positivity in all cases indicate that GOCs were derived from odontogenic epithelium; and BRAF positivity suggests involvement of this gene mutation in GOC development. Ki-67 positivity may indicate locally aggressive type, which warrants further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40986125What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.