ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2025
Comparative efficacy of two types polysomnography in diagnosing and monitoring OSA patients at COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective study.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sleep-related breathing disorders, including snoring and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), impact on the quality of life and are linked to various comorbidities. We retrospectively analyzed thirty-seven dental medical records of patients aged 25-80 with snoring and OSA treated with a customized mandibular advancement device (MAD) with the gold-standard type-I polysomnography (PSG) and home test with type-IV (BIOLOGIX) for OSA monitoring in clinical practice during the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on the clinical applicability. The metrics analyzed included the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), oxygen desaturation index (ODI), heart rate, and oxygen saturation (SpO2). Statistical analysis revealed significant changes in four metrics and correlations between heart rate and ODI. Results suggest that type-IV PSG is a viable alternative for OSA monitoring, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic when access to sleep labs was limited. The customized MAD effectively reduced AHI. Unlike type-I PSG, type-IV PSG has limited diagnostic; it does not provide comprehensive sleep metrics, which restricts its utility in complex cases. However, BIOLOGIX is a viable tool for monitoring patients in dental sleep medicine clinical practices. This study highlights the potential of type-IV PSG to enhance OSA management. Further research with larger samples is needed to refine its clinical application and improve predictive accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40986112What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.