ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2026
[
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
35 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose[
methodsConsecutive adult patients with a newly-diagnosed clinical T1 (cT1) renal mass (2-7 cm) presenting to participating sites December 2022 - February 2024 were recruited and underwent MIBI SPECT/CT prior to histopathological diagnosis. Patients who accepted and declined participation and clinicians involved in study activities were invited to a semi-structured interview. The primary endpoint was feasibility of multi-centre recruitment. Secondary endpoints included qualitative assessment of barriers and facilitators to participation, estimates of MIBI SPECT/CT accuracy to detect cancer in order to power a definitive study, inter-rater agreement and identifying training needs for scan acquisition and interpretation.
resultsOf 109 approached patients, 50 enrolled and underwent the study scan (45.8%, 95% CI 36.2-55.7%) across 6 sites. MIBI SPECT/CT scans were acquired and reported without the need for significant additional training. All scans were of adequate quality for interpretation. Sensitivity and specificity of MIBI SPECT/CT to detect cancer were 97.0% (95% CI 84.2-99.9%) and 53.8% (25.1-80.8%), respectively.
conclusionMULTI-MIBI has demonstrated feasibility of recruitment to a diagnostic evaluation study for T1 renal masses. Preliminary estimates of diagnostic accuracy suggest that MIBI SPECT/CT could reduce the number of patients with benign tumours undergoing surgery without missing a significant number of patients with malignant disease, however these results are limited by the small sample size in this feasibility study and a larger definitive study is needed prior to adoption in practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.