ReviewArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025
Perinatal bereavement rooms: a narrative review of physical space in perinatal grief.
Review in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPerinatal loss is a profoundly complex form of grief, often linked to heightened risk of prolonged bereavement and adverse mental health outcomes. Perinatal grief rooms-private, supportive spaces within healthcare settings-aim to help families process their loss, spend time with their baby, and create meaningful memories in a respectful environment. While bereavement care has received growing attention, the role of the physical environment in supporting grief remains underexplored.
objectiveTo synthesize current evidence on how dedicated physical spaces can support individuals and families after perinatal loss, and to identify priorities for research, design standards, and interdisciplinary collaboration.
methodsA narrative review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Literature searches were performed across PubMed, PsycINFO, Medline (OVID), Embase, ScienceDirect, SCOPUS, SciELO, and Google Scholar using terms, such as "perinatal grief rooms", "bereavement rooms", "angel suites", "butterfly suites", "snowdrop suites", "cloud rooms", "designated units for perinatal loss", and "birthing + bereavement suites". The review examined (1) the current role of physical spaces in the perinatal loss experience, and (2) how their availability and design may influence grief outcomes.
resultsOf the 17 articles meeting inclusion criteria, only 4 (24%) referenced bereavement rooms, and just 3 (18%) noted the need for formal protocols-without offering concrete examples. No studies evaluated implementation, design standards, or measurable impact on grief, mental health, or family well-being. This lack of empirical evidence and standardized guidance underscores a critical gap that limits integration of therapeutic environments into perinatal bereavement care.
conclusionDespite increasing recognition of the importance of bereavement care, dedicated grief rooms remain under-researched and inconsistently implemented. Advancing this field will require rigorously designed studies, development of design standards, and collaborative partnerships among healthcare providers, researchers, policymakers, and design experts to ensure equitable access to therapeutic spaces for grieving families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.