ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2025
Reassessing the role of external fixation in polytrauma and severly injured patients with chest trauma and femur fracture: a propensity score-matched analysis from the TraumaRegister DGU
Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nighttime intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures is not associated with worse outcomes: a 13-year Level I trauma center cohort.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEarly intramedullary nailing for femur fractures in patients with thoracic trauma has been controversial due to concerns about exacerbating pulmonary complications, particularly in cases of lung contusion. Older studies, relying on conventional radiographs that detected only severe contusions, recommended damage control surgery with external fixation. Today, high-resolution computed tomography (CT) detects even mild lung contusions, potentially overestimating lung damage. Coupled with modern ventilation strategies, this has prompted a reassessment of early definitive fixation versus external fixation in these patients.
methodsData from 3,087 patients with femur fractures and chest trauma (Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) ≥ 2) were extracted from the TraumaRegister DGU
resultsApproximately half of the patients (46.8%) received initial external fixation of the femur fracture. External fixation was associated with higher injury severity score (ISS 31.5 vs. 26.1; p < 0.001) and were more frequently treated in Level-1 trauma centers and during night shifts. A propensity score matched analysis revealed no significant differences in mortality (6.0% early definitive care vs. 7.4% external fixation; p = 0.212) or multiple organ failure rates (25.3% vs. 29.4%; p = 0.091). However, external fixation patients had longer ICU stays (median 10 vs. 7 days; p < 0.001) and hospital stays (median 25 vs. 20 days; p < 0.001).
conclusionThese findings suggest that external fixation of femur fractures may not be universally necessary, particularly in patients with moderate chest trauma, and early definitive care may offer comparable outcomes with shorter recovery times. Standardized criteria are needed to optimize treatment decisions and reserve external fixation for cases where it is clinically essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.