ArticlePsychological medicine2025
Reward processing disruption in anxiety: fMRI evidence of vulnerability to frustration non-reward.
Article in Psychological medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Phase synchronization alterations of EEG oscillations during emotional video processing in depression and anxiety: a transdiagnostic study.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAnxiety is a persistent trait that disrupts functioning and increases the risk of severe consequences, while reward processing has garnered attention in anxiety research. Here, we report a critical concern in reward processing among individuals with anxiety: although anxious individuals may show similar reward processing abilities as non-anxious individuals in typical environments, they are more vulnerable to disruptions in positive emotions caused by frustrative non-reward, leading to maladaptive reward processing patterns.
methodsThe functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used in this study. A total of 66 participants were recruited for the experiment, with 33 in the high anxiety (HA) group and 33 in the low anxiety (LA) group. The simulation of frustrative non-reward was conducted during fMRI scanning.
resultsUnder the low frustration condition, the HA group exhibited task accuracy comparable to the LA group and showed greater activation in visual processing regions (inferior occipital gyrus, superior occipital gyrus, angular gyrus) and cognitive control areas (precuneus, precentral gyrus) during attentional reorienting following frustration. However, in the high frustration condition, the HA group displayed significantly lower accuracy, with maladaptive information processing patterns observed in several brain regions associated with the cognitive-emotional control system (cuneus-precuneus, anterior cingulate cortex, precentral gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, superior frontal gyrus, orbitofrontal cortex, and amygdala).
conclusionsThis demonstration of two contrasting processing patterns deepens the current understanding of reward processing in anxiety. It also holds significance for a broader understanding of the risk factors in cognitive processing among individuals with anxiety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.