ArticleThe Eurasian journal of medicine2025
Exploring the Role of Learning Styles and Motivation in Medical Student Engagement and Academic Performance: A Mixed Methods Study.
Article in The Eurasian journal of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although numerous studies have examined the relationship between learning styles and factors such as gender, academic performance, and participation, no research has been found that comprehensively investigates the interplay between learning styles, motivation (intrinsic and extrinsic), and academic performance across diverse educational activities. This study aims to explore the influence of different learning styles and motivations (intrinsic and extrinsic) on medical students' engagement and academic performance. Methods: Using a mixed-methods approach, the study combined quantitative data from 169 medical students with qualitative insights from focus groups and in-depth interviews with 27 participants. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests, while qualitative data were thematically analyzed. Results: Findings revealed no significant direct relationship between learning styles and academic performance. However, intrinsic motivation was strongly associated with higher academic achievement. Female students showed a notable preference for visual and kinesthetic learning styles. Practical, hands-on educational activities, such as laboratory work and simulations, were linked to greater engagement, particularly for kinesthetic and visual learners. Students emphasized the importance of personalized feedback and diverse teaching methods in enhancing motivation. Conclusion: While learning styles alone do not predict academic performance, motivation, especially intrinsic motivation, plays a critical role in student achievement. The findings highlight the importance of using interactive and varied teaching methods that cater to different learning styles and foster motivation. Medical curricula should focus not only on accommodating diverse learning styles but also on strategies to enhance intrinsic motivation to improve academic outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.