Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40985847›Full record

ArticleRadiation protection dosimetry2025

Computed tomography dose management practices and the adoption of automated dose monitoring tools in Australia: a national survey.

Mohammed Alanazi, Peter Kench, Seyedamir Tavakoli-Taba, Ernest Ekpo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation protection dosimetry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohammed AlanaziMedical Image Optimisation and Perceptions Group, Discipline of Medical Imaging Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Susan Wakil Health Building, Camperdown Campus, Western Avnue,The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0009-0000-1123-6762
Peter KenchMedical Image Optimisation and Perceptions Group, Discipline of Medical Imaging Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Susan Wakil Health Building, Camperdown Campus, Western Avnue, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Seyedamir Tavakoli-TabaMedical Image Optimisation and Perceptions Group, Discipline of Medical Imaging Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Susan Wakil Health Building, Camperdown Campus, Western Avnue,The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Ernest EkpoMedical Image Optimisation and Perceptions Group, Discipline of Medical Imaging Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Susan Wakil Health Building, Camperdown Campus, Western Avnue,The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6851-0969

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates computed tomography (CT) dose management and automatic dose monitoring software (DMS) use in Australian radiology departments. An online survey covering departmental characteristics, dose management practices, DMS usage, and radiation protection activities was distributed through national radiation organisations and social media. Of the 132 initial responses received, 45 were eligible, completed, and analysed. The findings indicate 91% (n = 41/45) of departments regularly assess CT doses, with 63% (n = 26/41) conducting such assessments only once a year. Automatic DMS tools were utilised by 41% (n = 17/41) of these departments for CT dose data collection and analysis, while 59% (n = 24/41) relied on traditional methods. Only 25% (n = 6/24) of non-DMS users indicated plans for future adoption. A radiation protection team was present in 41% (n = 17/41) of departments. While dose assessment is commonly practised, it mostly relies on manual methods and is performed infrequently. Broader DMS implementation and formal radiation protection teams are recommended to strengthen CT dose management and enable continuous monitoring.

Indexed as

Radiation DosageRadiation MonitoringRadiation ProtectionRadiology Department, HospitalTomography, X-Ray ComputedAustraliaHumansSoftwareSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40985847
PMCPMC12537306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.