Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40985798›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025

Ebbinghaus Illusion Distortions in Amblyopia: Impairments of Visual Size Processing and Interocular Integration.

Changwu Tan, Xi Wang, Tong Liu, Longqian Liu, Alexandre Reynaud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Changwu TanDepartment of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Xi WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Tong LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Longqian LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Alexandre ReynaudMcGill Vision Research Unit, Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The perceived size of an object can be manipulated by its surroundings. In the current study, we wanted to investigate whether amblyopic patients have normal object size perception and how their perception is affected by abnormal interocular interactions. Methods: Sixteen adult amblyopes and 16 controls participated in this experiment. We measured the Ebbinghaus illusion magnitude with large and small inducers under one binocular, two monocular, and four dichoptic viewing configurations. Exploratory factor analysis was used to extract common structures and underlying mechanisms in different conditions. Results: The mean Ebbinghaus illusion magnitude in amblyopia was smaller with large inducers (F1,30 = 5.874, P = 0.021) and larger with small inducers (F1,30 = 5.814, P = 0.022) than in controls. For the small-inducer geometry, the interaction effect between groups and viewing configurations (F6,180 = 4.472, P < 0.001) was significant. Compared to the control population, the exploratory factor analysis in amblyopia extracted three more factors mainly accounting for dichoptic viewing configurations. Conclusions: Amblyopes tended to overestimate the object size relative to controls in the Ebbinghaus illusion, thereby amplifying it in the small-inducer geometry and diminishing it in the large-inducer geometry. Our factor analysis revealed a limited interocular transfer of the Ebbinghaus illusion in amblyopia, suggesting a defective mechanism in local binocular integration circuitry.

Indexed as

AmblyopiaOptical IllusionsSize PerceptionVision, BinocularAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedVisual AcuityYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40985798
PMCPMC12468097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.