ArticleThe Laryngoscope2026
Safety and Toxicity Evaluation of Stem Cell-Based Vocal Fold Implant in Swine.
Article in The Laryngoscope, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
introductionPrior to introduction in humans, new implant technology must be thoroughly assessed with preclinical animal trials. Cell-based or cell-derived therapies undergo FDA evaluation to be granted Investigational New Drug designation prior to human trials. While data required can vary across applications, standard safety and toxicity measures are valuable. We previously described a stem cell-based vocal fold implant for reconstruction of the vibratory vocal fold. This study describes a proposed set of implant release criteria and safety and toxicity evaluation following this implantation in Yucatan minipigs.
methodsEight Yucatan minipigs underwent bilateral Cell-based Outer Vocal Fold Replacement (COVR) containing multipotent human adipose stem cells. Perioperative corticosteroids and antibiotics were administered, but no chronic immunosuppressive medications were given. As a control, three additional animals had vocal fold resection without COVR implant and underwent an identical medication regimen. The animals were monitored for 6 months, with interval blood draws to measure basic chemistry, hematologic, and liver function tests. Any adverse events were recorded.
resultsSeveral animals demonstrated minor serologic findings outside of the defined normal range, but none demonstrated severe abnormalities. Adverse events included skin wound dehiscence in two animals and gastrointestinal symptoms accompanied by a temporary behavior change. All adverse events resolved following empiric treatment. Histologic examination demonstrated varying degrees of local immune response.
conclusionsHematologic and metabolic safety monitoring has thus far demonstrated no serious toxicity after xenograft vocal fold implantation in immunocompetent swine. Adverse events related to surgical complications are reported. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.