ArticleProtein engineering, design & selection : PEDS2025
Improving the production and stability of nanobodies.
Article in Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immuno-positron emission tomography in cardiovascular disease: Advances, challenges, and opportunities.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2026Review
- Nanobodies in biomedicine: from molecular characteristics to fabrication and clinical translation.Military Medical Research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanobodies offer unique advantages in biomedical and biotechnological applications due to their smaller size, ability to bind challenging epitopes, and affordable production using recombinant technology. However, challenges in large-scale production, stability, and solubility limit their widespread use. To address this, we use artificial intelligence tools to optimize the scaffold region of nanobodies. We apply our approach to four nanobodies against clinically relevant targets: the cytokine tumor necrosis factor alpha, the chemotherapeutic drug methotrexate, the pancreatic biomarker amylase, and the placental hormone chorionic gonadotropin. For all the nanobodies tested, we improve stability, production, and intracellular stability while maintaining antigen-binding affinity. Our results thus demonstrate the potential for using AI-driven protein engineering to enhance the properties of nanobodies, offering insights into the interplay between stability, solubility, and antigen binding. Given the high conservation of the scaffold, we propose some mutations that could directly transfer to other nanobodies, providing an easy-to-implement, generalizable engineering strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.