Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40985490›Full record

GuidelineInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2025

FIGO recommendations on objective measurement of blood loss after birth for early detection of postpartum hemorrhage.

Ferdousi Begum, Albaro J Nieto-Calvache, Dietmar Schlembach, Justus Hofmyer, Jose Palacios-Jaraquemada, Ajey Bhardwaj, Maria A Suarez, Juan M Burgos-Luna, Jolly Beyeza-Kashesya, Akaninyene E Ubom and 2 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. FIGO recommendations on objective measurement of blood loss after birth for early detection of postpartum hemorrhage.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. From guesstimates to game changers: Introducing objective measurement of blood loss for timely postpartum hemorrhage detection in Nigeria, Zambia, and Kenya.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ferdousi BegumInstitute of Woman and Child Health, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Albaro J Nieto-CalvacheDepartamento de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.
Dietmar SchlembachVivantes Clinics Berlin-Neukölln, Berlin, Germany.
Justus HofmyerEffective Care Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand and Walter Sisulu University, East London, South Africa.
Jose Palacios-JaraquemadaHospital Universitario CEMIC, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Ajey BhardwajAvni Health Foundation, Mumbai, India.
Maria A SuarezCentro De Investigaciones Clínicas, Fundación Valle Del Lili, Cali, Colombia.
Juan M Burgos-LunaDepartamento de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.
Jolly Beyeza-KashesyaMulago Specialised Women and Neonatal Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
Akaninyene E UbomWorld Association of Trainees in Obstetrics & Gynecology (WATOG), Paris, France.
Alison WrightRoyal Free Hospital, London, UK.
FIGO Committee on Childbirth and PPHFIGO, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) remains the leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide, particularly in resource-constrained and remote settings. The cornerstone of reducing PPH-related morbidity and mortality lies in its early recognition, timely treatment, and adherence to evidence-based protocols, all of which are heavily dependent on an accurate assessment of postpartum blood loss. Visual estimation, unfortunately, is still widely used, highly inaccurate, and often leads to underdiagnosis, resulting in a delayed or sometimes absent response to PPH. Objective quantification of blood loss, although not perfectly precise, provides a far more reliable estimate and is critical to triggering timely and effective interventions. This approach requires coordinated teamwork, leadership, institutional commitment, and a shift in clinical culture from subjective to standardized measurement practices. Scientific evidence strongly supports the integration of objective quantification into routine obstetric care. The use of calibrated drapes, cumulative measurement, and the combination of quantification with early warning systems have all proven to be effective in reducing PPH-related complications and deaths. Practical barriers are faced in implementing objective measurement strategies at the facility and institutional level, including availability, supply costs, environmental concerns, national and institutional advocacy, policy change, leadership, appropriate training, and, more importantly, resistance to change. Low-cost, reusable, and locally made devices can offer promising solutions for scaling up this intervention in resource-limited environments. Sustained success will depend on engagement with health departments of the governments for framing policies, guidelines for implementation, procurement and regular supplies, inter-institutional collaboration, and ongoing and refresher training for in-service healthcare providers. In the longer term, it requires inclusion into the medical curriculum, local leadership, champions, behavioral interventions, recognition and rewards to individuals, and teams who promote long-term adherence to best practice. Ultimately, although technical knowledge on PPH management is now well established, the real challenge lies in its consistent and context-appropriate identification and application. This article discusses the different definitions of PPH. It highlights the importance of objective quantification of blood loss during and after childbirth and the various available methods for blood loss measurement and explores their implementation across different clinical settings.

Indexed as

Postpartum HemorrhageEarly DiagnosisFemaleHumansPregnancyblood lossevidence‐based practicehealth resourcesmaternal mortalitymeasurementmultiprofessional workingpostpartum hemorrhagesurgicalteamwork

Identifiers

PMID40985490
PMCPMC12640184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.