ReviewGlobal health action2025
Public health disinformation, conflict, and disease outbreaks: a global narrative integrative review to guide new directions for health diplomacy.
Review in Global health action, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Public health diplomacy in an era of complexity, uncertainty, and unpredictability: perspectives from a YFG-ASPHER workshop.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The health diplomacy spiral: a conceptual framework linking health system integration and public health diplomacy.Public health reviews · 2026Review
- Public health diplomacy in Central Asia: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- How basic public health services shape social integration: Evidence from domestic migrants in China.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic laid bare the unpreparedness of global and public health systems to respond to large-scale health crises, while simultaneously revealing the entangled nature of disinformation and poor global and public health outcomes. This research challenges the common treatment of public health disinformation - deliberately false information - as an emergent and technical threat, and instead situates it as a more systemic and nuanced challenge for global health governance to address. This article presents an integrative narrative literature review on the interlinkages between public health disinformation, conflict, and disease outbreaks, demonstrating mutually influencing connections between them. In doing so, the analysis raises critical questions around how reactive responses, such as doubling down on information authority, can paradoxically fuel the uptake of both disinformation especially amidst global trends towards increasing conflict and decreasing cooperation. In this evolving sociopolitical landscape for global health, the discussion explores the potential to harness health diplomacy to strengthen critical public engagement and deliberation. This reimagined approach to health diplomacy offers pathways to mitigate the harmful effects of disinformation rather than seeking to eliminate false information. This article contributes to deepening an understanding of this rapidly expanding topic for global and public health in two pathways. First, by investigating the root causes and impacts of public health disinformation that intersect with conflict. Second, by exploring how health diplomacy can foster cooperative global health governance through transparency and inclusion. This research offers a new direction to strengthen preparedness for future global and public health crises amidst disinformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.