Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40985264›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025

Inverse Co-Design of Mechanical And Sensory Properties in Soft Lattice Foams for Multifunctional Wearables.

Qinghua Guan, Benhui Dai, Harshal Sonar, Josie Hughes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Qinghua GuanCREATE Lab, EPFL, Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5438-9232
Benhui DaiCREATE Lab, EPFL, Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1626-0128
Harshal SonarBearmind SA, EPFL Innovation Park, Bat. C, Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland.
Josie HughesCREATE Lab, EPFL, Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland.

Funding

Innosuisse - Schweizerische Agentur für Innovationsförderung 104.903 IP-ENGSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 10001574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lattice structures exhibit a variety of topological geometries, which endow them with diverse mechanical properties and high design flexibility, and enable them to be integrated with sensing mechanisms to collect environmental or intrinsic information. However, the traditionally empirical and separated design leads to difficulties in the integration of multiple functions and limits the exploration of the extensive properties of lattice foams. In this work, a design methodology is proposed for the inverse co-design of the mechanical and sensory properties of lattice foams by training an inverse-design neural network and optimizing the layer laminating permutations. Physics-informed numerical models and hybridization principles are employed to generate training data for the inverse mechanical design of hybrid foams. Subsequently, the mechano-electrical relationships are defined and utilized to predict and optimize the sensory behaviors of the hybrid foams. As a proof-of-concept example, a smart knee pad is developed to meet a specified target protective function and optimized sensory behavior, demonstrating not only its inverse-designed mechanical response but also its sensing capability from light interaction forces with users to heavy impact forces from collisions. This concept allows for more data-driven analytical approaches to satisfy the various needs for multi-functional wearable devices.

Indexed as

inverse designlattice foamsneural networksoft sensorswearable devices

Identifiers

PMID40985264
PMCPMC12667523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.