Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40985234›Full record

ArticleJournal of food science2025

Effect of Ultrasound on Extraction Efficiency and Functional Properties of Acacia Seeds Protein Concentrates.

Laxmi Ghimire, Nedumpillil Unnikrishnan Sruthi, Simon Warwick, Ranil Coorey, Rewati Raman Bhattarai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of food science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laxmi GhimireSchool of Molecular and Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7100-149X
Nedumpillil Unnikrishnan SruthiSchool of Molecular and Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Simon WarwickSchool of Molecular and Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Ranil CooreySchool of Molecular and Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5261-1300
Rewati Raman BhattaraiSchool of Molecular and Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2158-4423

Funding

Curtin University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acacia is an Australian-Aboriginal underutilized legume that contains high protein content (18%-35%). However, the commercial use of the seed's protein is limited due to minimum protein yield and low techno-functional properties. This research investigated the effect of ultrasound on protein yield and functionality of concentrated proteins from the seeds of two Acacia species (Acacia microbotrya and Acacia cyclops) and compared them to soybeans. Proteins were extracted from Acacia species and soybeans employing both ultrasound-assisted extraction and extraction without ultrasound, followed by isoelectric precipitation. The protein yield, functional characteristics, and protein structure were evaluated and compared. The protein yield in ultrasound-treated samples increased by 10.92%, 6.3%, and 7.84% in all protein concentrates (A. cyclops, A. microbotrya, and soybean), with the highest yield conditions being 80 W, 20 kHz, and 20 min. The emulsifying activity index in ultrasound-treated soybean protein concentrate was 2.85 m

Indexed as

AcaciaPlant ProteinsSeedsAustraliaFood HandlingGlycine maxUltrasonic WavesPlant ProteinsAcacia proteinextractiontechno‐functionalityultrasound | yield

Identifiers

PMID40985234
PMCPMC12455555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.