ArticleJournal of internal medicine2025
Oral anticoagulation in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding and new-onset atrial fibrillation: A population-based registry-linkage study.
Article in Journal of internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Oral anticoagulation in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding and new-onset atrial fibrillation: A population-based registry-linkage study.Journal of internal medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLimited data exist on the prevalence of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) and the impact of GIB on the initiation of oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy.
methodsA population-based registry-linkage study included all patients diagnosed with new-onset AF in Finland during 2010-2018 who had available laboratory data and a definite indication for OAC therapy. The primary outcome was OAC initiation within 90 days following AF diagnosis. Factors associated with OAC initiation were assessed using modified Poisson regression.
resultsAmong 117 997 patients with new-onset AF, 6628 (5.6%) had GIB, of which 5336 occurred more than 30 days prior to AF diagnosis, and 1292 were temporally (±30 days) associated with new-onset AF (GIBTAF). Patients with GIB compared to those without GIB were older (mean age 78.3 vs. 75.3 years), more frequently men (48.5% vs. 41.9%), and had more comorbidities. The occurrence of GIB was associated with a lower probability of initiating OAC (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.81-0.86). Among patients with GIB, an obscure origin of GIB (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.88-0.99) or GIBTAF reduced the likelihood of OAC initiation (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.66-0.79). The initiation of OAC did not depend on the known GIB bleeding site (lower vs. upper). Overall, the initiation of OAC therapy increased from 2010 to 2018 but remained consistently lower in patients with GIB.
conclusionPrior and concurrent GIB is common among patients with new-onset AF, and despite the overall increasing use of OACs, they remain less utilized in patients with GIB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.