Observational studyEuropean journal of neurology2025
Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Patients With Cardioembolic Breakthrough Stroke: An International Observational Study.
Observational study in European journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recurrent Stroke Following Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Patients with Breakthrough Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Cardioembolic Breakthrough Stroke: When Anticoagulation Fails, Is Left Atrial Appendage Closure the Next Step?European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Patients With Cardioembolic Breakthrough Stroke: An International Observational Study.European journal of neurology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) who experience an ischemic stroke despite oral anticoagulation (OAC) are at particularly high risk of recurrence, with a reported annualized ischemic stroke rate of 5.3%-8.9%. The optimal strategy for secondary prevention in these patients remains unknown.
methodsWe reviewed all percutaneous left atrial appendage closures (LAAC) attempted in AF patients experiencing an ischemic stroke under OAC and who were prospectively collected in four European centers. All index strokes were categorized by an experienced neurologist to exclude patients with non-cardioembolic etiology or insufficient OAC. The primary endpoint was a recurrent ischemic stroke at 2 years after the procedure. Secondary endpoints included procedure-related complications and 2-year death.
resultsOf 2234 patients submitted to LAAC procedure, 95 had a cardioembolic breakthrough stroke. LAAC procedures were performed at a mean of 4 months after the breakthrough stroke. The main antithrombotic therapy at discharge (83%) and at the latest follow-up (79%) consisted of OAC. At the median follow-up of 713 days, the primary endpoint occurred in 4 patients (4%). Procedure-related complications were rare (1%) whereas death occurred in 5% of patients.
conclusionLAAC procedures were safe and feasible in patients with cardioembolic breakthrough stroke. Recurrent stroke rates were lower than those reported in previous studies with OAC continuation after breakthrough stroke, suggesting a potential additive protection by LAAC on top of OAC. Results from ongoing randomized trials are required to validate our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.