Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40985093›Full record

ArticleActa otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale2025

Socio-economic impact of cochlear implantation in adults: an Italian study.

Annalisa Gatto, Margherita Tofanelli, Giorgio Valentinuz, Ludovico Carrino, Simone Zucchini, Egidio Sia, Francesco Uderzo, Vittorio Pietro Achilli, Giancarlo Tirelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Annalisa GattoDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Section of Otolaryngology, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Margherita TofanelliDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Section of Otolaryngology, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Giorgio ValentinuzDepartment of Economic, Business, Mathematical and Statistical Sciences 'Bruno de Finetti', University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Ludovico CarrinoDepartment of Economic, Business, Mathematical and Statistical Sciences 'Bruno de Finetti', University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Simone ZucchiniDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Section of Otolaryngology, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Egidio SiaDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Section of Otolaryngology, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Francesco UderzoDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Section of Otolaryngology, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Vittorio Pietro AchilliENT Department, Maggiore Hospital, Lodi, Italy.
Giancarlo TirelliDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Section of Otolaryngology, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To analyse the cost-effectiveness of unilateral cochlear implant (CI) surgery in Italian adults with post-lingual deafness, focusing on direct costs, Health Utilities Index (HUI), Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY), and Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER). Methods: The analysis, from the Italian healthcare system perspective, included preoperative, surgical, hospitalisation, and postoperative costs. QALYs were estimated using the Italian Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (I-NCIQ) and Ontario Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI-3). HUI-3 score changes were analysed with regression models in Stat View (v5.0.1, SAS Institute Inc). ICER was calculated as the incremental cost per QALY (in Euros/QALY) over the average patient's lifetime. Results: CI significantly improved I-NCIQ (p < 0.001) and HUI-3 scores (p < 0.0001). Average life expectancy at surgery was 21.2 years; the degrade factor was 0.97, yielding a lifetime gain of 2.717 QALYs. Direct costs amount to €19,467.65. Cost-utility analysis showed €7,165.13 per QALY, below the €30,000/QALY ICER threshold. Conclusions: CI surgery is cost-effective based on QALY analysis. Although cost-effectiveness decreases with age, quality of life and health benefits are comparable to younger patients.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationDeafnessAdultAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedQuality-Adjusted Life YearsSocioeconomic FactorsYoung Adultcochlear implantscost-effectiveness analysishearing lossquality-adjusted life years

Identifiers

PMID40985093
PMCPMC12456239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.