Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40985041›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2025

Impact of claudin 18.2 expression on treatment outcomes of first-line immunochemotherapy in patients with HER2-negative, proficient MMR, PD-L1 CPS ⩾1 metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer.

Fei Zhang, Izuma Nakayama, Naoya Sakamoto, Dai Okemoto, Amane Jubashi, Yuki Matsubara, Yu Miyashita, Seiya Sato, Shinpei Ushiyama, Akinori Kobayashi and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Fei ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Izuma NakayamaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8577, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4987-1934
Naoya SakamotoDepartment of Pathology and Clinical Laboratories, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Dai OkemotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Amane JubashiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Yuki MatsubaraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Yu MiyashitaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Seiya SatoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Shinpei UshiyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Akinori KobayashiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Ukyo Okazaki
Kazumasa YamamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4085-0741
Saori MishimaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Daisuke KotaniDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Akihito KawazoeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Tadayoshi HashimotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Yoshiaki NakamuraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Yasutoshi KubokiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Hideaki BandoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Takashi KojimaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Takayuki YoshinoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Takeshi KuwataDepartment of Pathology and Clinical Laboratories, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Kohei ShitaraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The effect of claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) expression on the outcomes of a first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-containing chemotherapy (ICI-chemo) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, proficient mismatch repair (pMMR), and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-expressing metastatic or recurrent gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancers (mGC/GEJC) remains unclear. Objectives: We assessed the effects of CLDN18.2 expression on the outcomes of first-line ICI-containing chemotherapy in patients with HER2-negative, pMMR, and PD-L1-expressing mGC/GEJC. Patients and methods: Medical records of patients with HER2-negative, pMMR, and PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ⩾1 unresectable/metastatic or recurrent GC/GEJC who received first-line ICI-chemo or chemotherapy alone (chemo-alone) between January 2016 and August 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The impact of CLDN18.2 status on the clinical outcomes was evaluated in patients receiving ICI-chemo and chemo-alone to assess the prognostic significance of CLDN18.2 in the absence of ICI. Results: A total of 150 patients were treated with ICI-chemo, whereas 313 patients received chemo-alone. CLDN18.2 positivity (⩾2+ in ⩾75% tumor cells) was identified in 42 patients (28.0%) in the ICI-chemo group and 94 patients (30.0%) in the chemo-alone group. There were no significant differences in the objective response rate (ORR; 68.3% vs 70.3%, Conclusion: CLDN18.2 expression exerted no impact on outcomes of first-line ICI-chemo and chemo-alone in patients with HER2-negative, pMMR, and PD-L1 CPS ⩾1 mGC/GEJC.

Indexed as

claudin 18.2gastric cancerimmunochemotherapyproficient mismatch repairprogrammed death-ligand 1

Identifiers

PMID40985041
PMCPMC12450271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.