ArticleLocal and regional anesthesia2025
Retrospective Comparison of Extrafascial versus Intrafascial Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block with Reduced Volume: Impact on Hemidiaphragmatic Paralysis and Hemodynamic Effects in Shoulder Surgery Patients.
Article in Local and regional anesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regional anesthesia strategies for proximal humerus fracture surgery: anatomical considerations, diaphragm-sparing techniques, and expert perspectives-a narrative review.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Review
- Incidence of hemi-diaphragmatic paresis with different volumes of local anaesthetics in interscalene brachial plexus block.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block (ISBPB) is commonly used for shoulder surgery anesthesia to reduce opioid use and general anesthesia complications. However, it may cause diaphragmatic paresis due to phrenic nerve involvement. This study compares the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis and the frequency of side effects-including hemodynamic changes and postoperative complications-between the Extrafascial (ExF) and Intrafascial (InF) approaches for ISBPB using reduced anesthetic volume. The aim is to assess whether the ExF approach may be preferable in patients with reduced cardiopulmonary reserve (eg, COPD or heart failure). Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at Federico II University in Naples, Italy, including 61 patients undergoing shoulder surgery from January 2024 to October 2024. About 33 patients received ExF while 28 received InF ISBPB, all with Ropivacaine 0.5% (10 mL), Mepivacaine 2% (5 mL), and Dexamethasone (4 mg). The primary outcome was the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis, evaluated via ultrasound pre and 30 minutes after the block by assessing diaphragm excursion, thickness, and thickening fraction. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative hemodynamic changes and postoperative complications: pain (NRS), analgesic/antiemetic requests, PONV, pruritus, shivering, anxiety, and discomfort. Results: The TF significantly decreased after the block in both groups (p < 0.001), with no intergroup. Diaphragm paralysis occurred in 28 patients in each group (p = 0.093), without clinical respiratory effects. The InF group had more hypotension episodes (100% vs 30.3%, p = 0.002), and significantly lower mean and systolic blood pressure values at 1 and 2 hours after-block. No cases of anxiety, pruritus, shivering, or discomfort were observed. NRS was higher in the InF group at 6 hours but lower at 12 and 24 hours. Analgesic/antiemetic needs were similar; PONV was more frequent in the ExF. Conclusion: Both approaches resulted in similar rates of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis. However, ExF was associated with fewer hemodynamic effects, suggesting potential benefit in high-risk cardiopulmonary patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.