ArticleInnovation in aging2025
Prescribing patterns of psychotropic medications among people living with dementia after disasters.
Article in Innovation in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of natural disasters on the cognitive state of older adults with dementia: a scoping review.European geriatric medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Disasters can worsen behavioral symptoms in people living with dementia, leading to disorientation, anxiety, and paranoia. In such situations, psychotropic medications may be inappropriately used to manage these symptoms. This study estimated the receipt of new, or changes to existing, psychotropic prescription medications post-disaster among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with a dementia diagnosis. Research Design and Methods: Medicare administrative claims data were used to examine the relationship between hurricane exposure and receipt of antipsychotic prescriptions among people living with dementia with no prior use. The primary outcome was a daily count of new psychotropic prescriptions per beneficiary, from Part D claims, residing in exposed and unexposed counties 12 months after the hurricane landfall. The secondary outcome was a daily count of increases in the dosage of psychotropic prescriptions. Federal Emergency Management Agency disaster declarations were used to determine disaster-exposed groups. Results: A total of 70 307 traditional fee-for-service beneficiaries with a dementia diagnosis were included in the study. In analyses adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, Part D low-income subsidy status, rurality and number of Elixhauser comorbidities conducted over a 12-month period following the three hurricanes, beneficiaries exposed to the hurricanes had a 10% higher rate of starting new antipsychotic prescriptions compared to those in unexposed counties (IRR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.04-1.17). Analyses conducted by individual hurricanes revealed substantial differences, with higher rates of initiating antipsychotics following Hurricane Harvey (IRR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.07-1.36), and no change after Hurricanes Irma (IRR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.88-1.08) and Florence (IRR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.80-1.05). Discussion and Implications: Psychotropic prescribing increased after Hurricane Harvey but not after Irma or Florence, suggesting context-specific factors may influence clinical responses during disasters. Our findings highlight the importance of incorporating person-centered care and appropriate behavioral health responses into disaster preparedness planning for the dementia population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.