Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40984998›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2025

Machine learning electrocardiography model to differentiate takotsubo syndrome from myocardial infarction.

Felicia H K Hakansson, Erik Bodin, Vincent Dutordoir, Axel Gemvik, Thomas Olsson, Isabelle Nilsson, Mikael Andersson Franko, Jonas Spaak, Christina Ekenbäck, Loghman Henareh and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Felicia H K HakanssonDepartment of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4894-9237
Erik BodinDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Vincent DutordoirDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Axel GemvikDepartment of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Thomas OlssonDepartment of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Isabelle NilssonDepartment of Cardiology, Capio St. Görans Sjukhus, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mikael Andersson FrankoDepartment of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9837-4486
Jonas SpaakDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Danderyds Hospital, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2135-1294
Christina EkenbäckDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Danderyds Hospital, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4401-7117
Loghman HenarehDepartment of Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8983-0398
Carl Henrik EkDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1302-6309
Per TornvallDepartment of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7529-1338

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Machine learning (ML) algorithms applied to the electrocardiography (ECG) have been successful in several cardiac diagnoses, however, rarely been used for the diagnostics of takotsubo syndrome (TTS). Our aim was to develop ML-based ECG-models to differentiate TTS from patients with myocardial infarction (MI). Methods and results: Cross-sectional study in Stockholm. A neural network with UNet architecture was trained and validated on 507 TTS cases and 14 978 controls with suspected and verified MI, identified from the Swedish coronary angiography and angioplasty register. Cross-validation was performed. The models were compared with cardiologists using previously proposed ECG criteria. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) for discriminating TTS from patients with ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation MI ROC AUC 0.88 (cross-validation: 0.85-0.92) and 0.86 (cross-validation: 0.82-0.91), respectively. ROC AUC for discriminating TTS from verified MI [non-ST-elevation MI (NSTEMI) and ST-elevation MI (STEMI)] was 0.87 (cross-validation: 0.83-0.91) with sensitivity (0.75) and specificity (0.83) with low positive predictive value (PPV) and high negative predictive value (NPV). Results for suspected MI was ROC AUC 0.85 (cross validation: 0.81-0.91) with sensitivity (0.75) and specificity (0.79) with low PPV (0.11) and high NPV (0.99). The committee of two cardiologists using a combination of ECG criteria achieved an ROC AUC of 0.71. Conclusion: Machine learning models could discriminate TTS from MI (NSTEMI and STEMI) and suspected MI with high sensitivity and NPV, outperforming cardiologists using conventional criteria. The models require further refinement to increase PPV, precision-recall and external validation, but it holds promise for TTS screening aiding the clinician in ruling out TTS.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceElectrocardiographyMachine learningMyocardial infarctionTakotsubo syndrome

Identifiers

PMID40984998
PMCPMC12450510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.