Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40984996›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2025

Performance and safety of a novel, cable-free, patch-based, and AI-enhanced ECG monitoring system: a comparative study.

Owain Thomas, Rikard Linnér, Alain Dardashti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Owain ThomasAnesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund, Section II, Skånes Universitetssjukhus Lund 221 85, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2515-6581
Rikard LinnérAnesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund, Section II, Skånes Universitetssjukhus Lund 221 85, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9178-8686
Alain DardashtiThoracic Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund, Section II, Skånes Universitetssjukhus  Lund 221 85, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: ECG monitoring is often required during critical phases of illness. To evaluate the role of modern technology and advanced analytical algorithms artificial intelligence compared with standard-of care, we undertook a prospective, head-to-head comparison of a novel, cable-free, patch-based, and AI-enhanced electrocardiography system (CardioSenseSystem) with standard of care (SOC) ECG monitoring. Patients who had undergone cardiac surgery at a large university hospital (Skåne University Hospital, Sweden) were simultaneously monitored by both systems, and alarms and monitoring interruptions were recorded. Methods and results: Forty-nine patients were recruited. The CardioSenseSystem system demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity, correctly detecting 364 critical red alarms vs. 12 for SOC ( Conclusion: The CardioSenseSystem system delivered significant advantages over conventional ECG monitoring in post-cardiac surgery patients. Its high sensitivity, reduced false alarms, fewer monitoring interruptions, and decreased handling time suggest that it may enhance patient outcomes and clinical efficiency, warranting broader application in acute-care settings.

Indexed as

Alarm fatigueCritical arrhythmia alarmsECG monitoringECG patchECG telemetryLife-threatening arrhythmia alarms

Identifiers

PMID40984996
PMCPMC12450504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.