ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2025
Artificial intelligence-driven electrocardiogram analysis for risk stratification in pulmonary embolism.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Integration of ECG and Molecular Biomarkers in Pulmonary Embolism.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Case Report: Fabry disease presenting with electrocardiographic findings mimicking acute myocardial infarction: a diagnostic challenge.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- The Hidden Signal: P Wave Morphology and In-Hospital Mortality in Acute Pulmonary Embolism.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aims: Among patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE), rapid identification of those with highest clinical risk can help guide life-saving treatment. However, current risk stratification algorithms involve a multistep process requiring physical exam, imaging, and laboratory results. We investigated the utility of electrocardiogram (ECG) alone to rapidly identify patients at elevated clinical risk by developing and validating a feature-based artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict clinical risk. Methods and results: Patients who were diagnosed with PE over a 9-year period, had an ECG within 1 day of presentation, and were evaluated by our PE response team (PERT) were included. A feature-based random forest model was trained to predict the PERT team's risk stratification from the ECG alone. The ability of the model to predict the clinical risk categorization and the accuracy of both risk stratification approaches in predicting mortality were examined on a holdout test set. Of the overall cohort of 1376 patients, 55% had a submassive (intermediate risk) or massive (high risk) PE, which were grouped together as 'severe PE'. The AI-ECG model was able to predict the clinical classification (low-risk vs. severe PE) with an AUC of 0.83 and F1 score of 0.78 in a holdout test set. A 30-day mortality and in-hospital mortality were significantly different between patients classified by the model as low vs. elevated risk. Conclusion: AI-based analysis of 12-lead ECGs may provide a useful tool in the risk stratification of PE, allowing for rapid identification and treatment of those at highest risk of adverse outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.