ArticleiScience2025
Half of annotated human microRNAs are expressed at levels of questionable biological significance.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- microRNA-155: a versatile noncoding RNA.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Spatiotemporal Control of microRNA-Target Interactions.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNAReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are widely studied for their role in post-transcriptional gene regulation, often using exogenous overexpression to infer function. However, such approaches may not reflect physiological activity, as they rely on unnaturally high expression levels. To address this, we determined the minimal threshold required for detectable endogenous miRNA function using sensitive reporters. Comparison with small RNA sequencing data from thousands of cell lines and tissues revealed that over half of all miRNAs never reach functionally relevant levels, with more recently evolved miRNAs generally exhibiting lower expression. This challenges the validity of numerous studies reporting roles for lowly expressed miRNAs, suggesting many findings reflect artifacts of overexpression rather than true biological activity. Our work underscores the importance of evaluating miRNA function in a native context and supports the view that the functional human "microRNAome" is substantially smaller than estimates based solely on sequencing data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.