Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40984970›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Evaluating Surgical Strategies for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Meta-Analysis of Posterior Spinal Fusion and Vertebral Body Tethering.

Daniel E Onobun, Rahim Hussain, Gerald Lim, Ethel O Ojo, Chijioke Orji, Althea O George, Ajibola A Adebisi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel E OnobunOrthopaedics and Trauma, Warwick Hospital, South Warwickshire University NHS Foundation Trust, Warwick, GBR.
Rahim HussainGeneral Surgery, Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester, GBR.
Gerald LimOrthopaedics and Trauma, Warwick Hospital, South Warwickshire University NHS Foundation Trust, Warwick, GBR.
Ethel O OjoOrthopaedics and Trauma, Warwick Hospital, South Warwickshire University NHS Foundation Trust, Warwick, GBR.
Chijioke OrjiOrthopaedics, Liverpool University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Liverpool, GBR.
Althea O GeorgeSurgery/Urology, The Royal London Hospital, London, GBR.
Ajibola A AdebisiGeneral Surgery, Surgery Interest Group of Africa, Lagos, NGA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a three-dimensional spinal deformity commonly affecting adolescents worldwide. Surgical management traditionally involves posterior spinal fusion (PSF), which achieves stable deformity correction but may limit spinal motion and growth potential. Vertebral body tethering (VBT) has emerged as a motion-preserving alternative aimed at modulating spinal growth while correcting curvature. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared PSF and VBT in terms of deformity correction, complication and revision rates, and postoperative functional outcomes. Data from multiple clinical studies were analyzed using standardized methods for pooling and evaluating outcomes. Results indicated that PSF generally provides more consistent and reliable curve correction with fewer complications and revisions, while VBT offers advantages in preserving motion and facilitating earlier postoperative recovery. However, VBT demonstrated greater variability in results and a higher likelihood of requiring additional interventions. These findings highlight the need for individualized treatment planning that considers curve severity, skeletal maturity, and long-term functional goals. PSF remains a robust corrective option, whereas VBT represents a promising motion-sparing approach for carefully selected patients. Further research is warranted to refine patient selection criteria and optimize long-term outcomes of non-fusion techniques.

Indexed as

adolescent idiopathic scoliosismotion preservation surgeryposterior spinal fusionspinal deformity correctionsurgical outcomesvertebral body tethering

Identifiers

PMID40984970
PMCPMC12450359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.