Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40984914›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Evaluating and Improving the Quality of Clinical Documentation Using the Background, Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan (BSOAP) Format: A Clinical Audit at El-Gadarif Teaching Hospital.

Mohamed Osman Mohamed Idres, Omer Mohamed Elsheikh Osman, Hadeel Zaki Fathi Salih, Sohaib Yagub Salih Ali, Roaa Adil Abubakr Mohamed, Mujtaba Ahmed Mohamed Hamd, Mukhtar Magdi Mukhtar Bastawi, Omer Alnaile Ali Mohammed, Noura Hashim Abuelgasim Ataelmanan, Suzan Mohammed Eltayeb Eltahir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mohamed Osman Mohamed IdresSurgery, Sudan International University, Khartoum, SDN.
Omer Mohamed Elsheikh OsmanGeneral Surgery, El-Gadarif Teaching Hospital, El-Gadarif, SDN.
Hadeel Zaki Fathi SalihGeneral Surgery, El-Gadarif Teaching Hospital, El-Gadarif, SDN.
Sohaib Yagub Salih AliGeneral Surgery, El-Gadarif Teaching Hospital, El-Gadarif, SDN.
Roaa Adil Abubakr MohamedGeneral Surgery, El-Gadarif Teaching Hospital, El-Gadarif, SDN.
Mujtaba Ahmed Mohamed HamdGeneral Surgery, El-Gadarif Teaching Hospital, El-Gadarif, SDN.
Mukhtar Magdi Mukhtar BastawiGeneral Surgery, El-Gadarif Teaching Hospital, El-Gadarif, SDN.
Omer Alnaile Ali MohammedGeneral Surgery, El-Gadarif Teaching Hospital, El-Gadarif, SDN.
Noura Hashim Abuelgasim AtaelmananGeneral Surgery, El-Gadarif Teaching Hospital, El-Gadarif, SDN.
Suzan Mohammed Eltayeb EltahirInternal Medicine, Sudan Medical Specialization Board, Khartoum, SDN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical documentation is a cornerstone of patient care, ensuring continuity, legal protection, and effective communication among healthcare providers. This study aimed to evaluate and improve the quality of clinical documentation using the Background, Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan (BSOAP) format at El-Gadarif Teaching Hospital.

methodsThe clinical audit was carried out in two distinct cycles. The first cycle retrospectively reviewed 25 follow-up notes to establish baseline compliance with documentation standards. Interventions, including staff training and the introduction of a structured BSOAP template, were implemented. The second cycle prospectively assessed another 25 notes to evaluate improvements. Data were analyzed using MS Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, United States), and compliance rates were compared between cycles.

resultsSignificant improvements were observed across multiple documentation domains. Compliance with background information increased from 88% to 92%, while objective data documentation, such as vital signs, improved from 68% to 84%. The most notable improvement was in the assessment section, where problem list documentation rose from 0% to 64%. Adherence to BSOAP documentation guidelines demonstrated a significant enhancement, rising from an initial compliance rate of 31.1% during the first phase of the audit to an impressive 84.9% in the subsequent phase.

conclusionThe introduction of a well-organized BSOAP template, coupled with comprehensive staff training, led to a marked improvement in the accuracy and completeness of clinical documentation. These results highlight the critical role of standardized documentation frameworks in optimizing patient care and promoting adherence to established clinical protocols.

Indexed as

bsoap formatclinical auditclinical documentationcompliance improvementstandardized templates

Identifiers

PMID40984914
PMCPMC12450290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.