ArticleCureus2025
Stump Appendicitis After Appendectomy: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute appendicitis is one of the most common causes of emergency surgery worldwide. Its diagnosis is primarily based on clinical presentation, supported by laboratory tests such as a complete blood count and imaging studies, with a non-contrast CT scan considered the gold standard. Although appendectomy is generally safe, it carries the risk of immediate and delayed complications. One such complication, stump appendicitis, is rare and often underrecognized, which can delay diagnosis and treatment. The objective of this report is to highlight the importance of considering stump appendicitis in patients with a prior history of appendectomy who present with symptoms suggestive of acute appendicitis. Prompt recognition is crucial to prevent severe complications, including peritonitis secondary to intestinal perforation, which can increase morbidity and mortality. We present the case of a 48-year-old male from Chihuahua, Mexico, who arrived at our hospital's emergency department with a four-day history of abdominal pain localized predominantly in the right iliac fossa. His medical history included an appendectomy performed several years earlier, which initially led clinicians to consider alternative diagnoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.