ReviewCureus2025
Microbiota-Based Therapies for Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection: A Systematic Review of Their Efficacy and Safety.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbiome-based therapeutics forGut microbes · 2026Review
- Letter: Dose and Donor Matter-Determining the Optimal Strategy for Faecal Microbiota Transplantation in Clostridioides difficile Infection. Authors' Reply.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Host-gut microbiota interactions in health and disease: mechanisms and intervention strategies.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Fecal microbiota transplant and its usefulness in hepatic disorders: a systematic review.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026Review
- An Update on Dynamic Changes in Cytokine Expression and Dysbiosis Due to Radiation Combined Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- The Impact of Diet on the Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Success in Patients with Gastrointestinal Diseases-A Literature Review.Nutrients · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recurrent
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.