ArticleCureus2025
Refractory Coronary Vasospasm Leading to Cardiac Arrest: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a rare case of refractory coronary vasospasm in a 69-year-old African American male patient, initially misdiagnosed as typical thrombotic acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and treated with placement of a drug-eluting stent. The patient, unfortunately, experienced multiple subsequent readmissions and repeat angiography procedures due to refractory, multivessel vasospasm episodes despite compliance with medical therapy. This ultimately culminated in witnessed ventricular fibrillation arrest, requiring placement of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). This case underscores the diagnostic complexity of vasospastic angina, especially when it mimics obstructive coronary disease and ACS on both clinical presentation and angiography. Long-term management includes appropriate medication titration, patient education on symptom awareness and prompt treatment, and trigger avoidance. Six months post-discharge, the patient reported significant symptomatic improvement, no further hospitalizations, or ICD shocks. This case illustrates the potential severity of multivessel coronary vasospasm and supports a high index of suspicion in cases of unexplained recurrent chest pain, even following successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.