Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40984879›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2025

A semi-automatic approach to study population dynamics based on population pyramids.

Max Hahn-Klimroth, João Pedro Meireles, Laurie Bingaman Lackey, Nick van Eeuwijk, Mads F Bertelsen, Paul W Dierkes, Marcus Clauss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Aging populations threaten conservation goals of zoos.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Max Hahn-KlimrothGoethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
João Pedro MeirelesUniversity of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Laurie Bingaman Lackey1230 Oakland Street, Hendersonville, NC, USA.
Nick van EeuwijkUtrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Mads F BertelsenCopenhagen Zoo, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Paul W DierkesGoethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Marcus ClaussUniversity of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The depiction of populations - of humans or animals - as 'population pyramids' is a useful tool for the assessment of various characteristics of populations at a glance. Although these visualisations are well-known objects in various communities, formalised and algorithmic approaches to gain information from these data are less present. Here, we present an algorithm-based classification of population data into 'pyramids' of different shapes that can be linked to typical demographic properties. The classification accuracy of the algorithm was tested on over 50,000 population pyramids from 450 mammal species. The approach delivers plausible classifications, in particular with respect to changes in population size linked to specific series of, and transitions between, different 'pyramid' shapes. We believe this approach might become a useful tool for analysing and communicating historical population developments in multiple contexts and is of broad interest. Moreover, it might be useful for animal population management strategies.•Introducing a deterministic algorithmic approach to classify population pyramid data.•Data discretization step to reduce data complexity and to unify data.•Classification of a population pyramid into non-species-specific shape categories that are linked to specific characteristics of the population.

Indexed as

ClassificationDemographyDimensionality reductionPopulation managementPopulation pyramid

Identifiers

PMID40984879
PMCPMC12450563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.