Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40984862›Full record

ReviewJournal of plankton research

On the ecological duality between ciliates and dinoflagellates across marine ecosystems.

Albert Calbet

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of plankton research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Albert CalbetDepartment of Marine Biology and Oceanography, Institut de Ciències del Mar, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta 37-49, Barcelona 08003, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1069-212X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marine ciliates and dinoflagellates are key microzooplankton groups in oceanic food webs. A prevailing ecological framework suggests that ciliates dominate under cool, mixed conditions typical of late winter and early spring, whereas dinoflagellates prevail in warmer, stratified waters during late spring and summer. This review highlights how temperature, stratification, nutrient dynamics, prey composition, turbulence and top-down control shape seasonal and regional patterns. While the ciliate-dinoflagellate succession is often observed in temperate seas, it is not universal. Polar regions exhibit compressed seasonality, while tropical systems show weak seasonality, often dominated by mixotrophic dinoflagellates. The widespread occurrence of mixotrophy in both groups complicates this duality, allowing species to persist across contrasting environmental conditions. Ultimately, the relative dominance of ciliates or dinoflagellates reflects a context-dependent interplay of multiple drivers rather than a fixed seasonal rule. As climate change intensifies ocean stratification and alters nutrient regimes, understanding these dynamics becomes critical to predict shifts in plankton communities and their consequences for marine biogeochemical processes and ecosystem functioning.

Indexed as

ciliatesclimate changedinoflagellatesmicrozooplanktonmixotrophynutrient dynamicsocean stratificationseasonal succession

Identifiers

PMID40984862
PMCPMC12450349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.