Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40984835›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2025

Outcomes following totally endoscopic mitral valve replacement versus mitral valve replacement through right thoracotomy: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Sandip Sardar, Monalisa Datta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sandip SardarVivekananda Institute of Medical Sciences, Ramakrishna Mission Seva Pratishthan, Kolkata, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6050-4660
Monalisa DattaVivekananda Institute of Medical Sciences, Ramakrishna Mission Seva Pratishthan, Kolkata, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7513-0211

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Total endoscopic video-assisted mitral valve replacement represents a comparatively new advancement in cardiac surgery. It is associated with cosmetic benefits, minimal pain, and shorter hospital stay than right anterolateral thoracotomy approach of minimally invasive mitral valve replacement. Our study aims to delineate the advantages and disadvantages of these two minimally invasive techniques along with the relative improvement of quality of life. In this prospective randomized study, 40 patients undergoing isolated mitral valve replacement via right anterolateral thoracotomy approach (group A) and 40 patients undergoing the same procedure using the totally endoscopic method (group B) were randomly selected. Immediate postoperative outcomes, including duration of intensive care unit and hospital stay, were analyzed. Additionally, outcomes were assessed at 1 and 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year. Group B exhibited significantly lower pain scores (

Indexed as

Endoscopic cardiac surgeryKey hole cardiac surgeryMinimally invasive cardiac surgeryMitral valve replacementRight anterolateral thoracotomy

Identifiers

PMID40984835
PMCPMC12450143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.