ArticleKorean journal of orthodontics2025
Histological response of the periodontal tissue to mandibular incisor movement using clear aligners of varying thickness in a rabbit model.
Article in Korean journal of orthodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Investigate the histological response of the periodontal tissue to incisor movement using varying-thickness clear aligners in a rabbit model. Methods: Thirty-three New Zealand rabbits were randomly assigned to two experimental groups (0.38-mm and 0.68-mm aligners) and a control group. Each rabbit in the experimental group wore three sequential aligners, which were changed every 5 days. Orthodontic force was measured using a uniaxial force sensor, and tooth movement was quantified using three-dimensional imaging. Root resorption was assessed using micro-computed tomography. Histological and immunohistochemical staining and real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction tests were performed to evaluate the periodontal tissue response. Results: The 0.68-mm aligners generated larger forces than the 0.38-mm aligners. Tooth movement was faster with the third 0.38-mm aligner, with no statistically significant differences between the two groups. Both groups exhibited minor root resorption, with the 0.68-mm group exhibiting larger resorption craters. Additionally, the 0.68-mm group demonstrated more significant deformation of periodontal fibers and increased expression of inflammatory markers. The 0.38-mm group showed a larger number of osteoclasts on the compression side. Conclusions: Both aligners achieved effective tooth movement. The 0.38-mm aligners exerted smaller forces and enabled slightly faster movements than the 0.68-mm aligners. Although both groups showed minimal root resorption, the 0.68-mm group exhibited larger resorption craters. Furthermore, the 0.38-mm group exhibited less histological deformation and inflammation in the periodontal tissues. These results suggest that aligner thickness can be tailored to customize treatments. Further studies with longer observation periods and more refined methodologies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.