ArticleKorean journal of orthodontics2025
Accuracy assessment of Smart stereolithography models generated by Dental Monitoring®: A pilot study.
Article in Korean journal of orthodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This pilot study aims to evaluate the clinical accuracy of Smart stereolithography (STL) files generated by the Dental Monitoring® (DM) system by comparing them with gold standard intraoral scans (IOSs). Methods: Seven aligner patients using the DM application were included. For each patient, Smart STL files generated from remote scans were superimposed onto IOSs using the best-fit algorithm in OnyxCeph software. Differences regarding inclination, angulation, rotation, buccal/lingual, mesial/distal, and intrusion/extrusion were quantified and statistically compared. Results: Statistically significant differences were observed in inclination, mesial/distal, and buccal/lingual movements, particularly in the posterior segments. However, all deviations remained within clinically acceptable thresholds for single aligner tooth movement. Conclusions: Despite minor deviations, Smart STL files generated by DM demonstrated sufficient accuracy for use in aligner planning and refinement. These findings highlight the potential of DM-generated Smart STL files for subsequent aligner treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.