ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2025
Temporal and Spatial Survey on the Abundance of Amoebae and Bacteria in an Estuary and the Role of Environmental Parameters.
Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Temporal and Spatial Survey on the Abundance of Amoebae and Bacteria in an Estuary and the Role of Environmental Parameters.Environmental microbiology reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Free-living amoebae are phagotrophic protists that prey on bacteria. However, under certain conditions, some bacteria can resist phagocytosis and become pathogenic. Environmental parameters altered by climate change may impact amoebae and bacterial diversity, as well as their pathogenicity. In our study, we monitored amoebae and bacterial abundance both temporally, over 1 year, and spatially, along a river estuary, while also recording key environmental parameters. Naegleria was the most represented amoebae genus, present year-round from the river to the estuary. Similarly, Vibrio was the most dominant bacterial genus. Salinity, and to a lesser extent dissolved oxygen, influenced amoebae and bacterial abundance. In particular, the genera Naegleria, Paramoeba, Pseudomonas and Legionella were the most affected. In conclusion, this study highlights the impact of salinity on amoebae diversity, suggesting that this parameter, as a key factor in coastal environments, will impact both amoebae and the associated bacterial communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.