ArticleThe Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry2026
Return on investment from interventions to prevent common mental disorders among adolescents in Australia: A modelling study.
Article in The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The economic case for increased investment in the treatment of adolescents with common mental disorders in Colombia and South Africa.Health policy and planning · 2026Article
- Nonlinear association between body mass index, perceived discrimination, and psychological sub-health problems among adolescents: risks of undernutrition versus overnutrition.BMC psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe prevalence of common mental disorders (CMDs, depression/anxiety) among Australian adolescents is increasing. Evidence is needed to inform how prevention efforts can be focused for greatest impact. This study used a compartmental model to estimate how investments could be optimally allocated across interventions to prevent CMDs in adolescents, and the corresponding health and economic benefits.
methodsThe Australian 0- to 19-year-old population was disaggregated by age (0-9, 10-14, 15-19), sex (male, female) and CMD experience (never, currently, previously). Twelve prevention interventions were included following targeted reviews. The model was calibrated to Australian population survey data and included sociodemographic risk factors from the literature that were relevant for included interventions (bullying, financial stress, poor school connectedness, racial discrimination, child maltreatment). An optimisation estimated how an additional AUD$50 million-AUD$1 billion per annum over 2024-2050 could be allocated across interventions to maximise the number of adolescents turning 20 without a lifetime experience of CMD.
resultsThe benefit-cost ratios of interventions varied widely depending on whether they impacted CMDs directly or indirectly by reducing a risk factor, and also whether CMD was their primary purpose or not (e.g. poverty interventions). Optimally investing AUD$50 million-AUD$1 billion p.a. over 2024-2050 could lead to 144,577-791,277 fewer adolescents experiencing a CMD by age 20 (AUD$5064-AUD$18,507/lifetime CMD experience averted), with lower bound benefit-cost ratios ranging from 5.0 to 19.2. Optimally, budget allocations should include combinations of interventions targeting different age groups, sub-populations and risk factors.
conclusionsInvesting in evidence-based prevention interventions for adolescent mental health is likely to have a favourable return-on-investment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.